The trouble with GMOs
From Austin Storm
Revision as of 14:19, 6 September 2019 by Austinstorm (Created page with "...or at least with our cultural debate about GMOs: <blockquote>Since a key selling point for Lynas is that he is a convert — a former GMO opponent who saw the light — th...")
...or at least with our cultural debate about GMOs:
Since a key selling point for Lynas is that he is a convert — a former GMO opponent who saw the light — the book remains useful as a case study. What has gone wrong with the debate such that even someone who has occupied both sides has no new insight into why the two continue to talk past each other? The central problem that plagues Lynas’s argument is the same one that plagues the GMO debate in general: The conceit that the battle will be won by establishing a unitary scientific Truth about whether genetically modified organisms are good or bad. This view from nowhere is impossible to achieve for an issue bound up with so many questions of social and cultural meaning, from humanity’s relation to nature, to the significance of life, to the role of markets in creating, shaping, and producing it.
- Tess Doezema, Why Science Can’t Break the GMO Stalemate