Difference between revisions of "White Fragility"

From Austin Storm
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "I have always punished myself by reading whichever books are popular, at least the ones that reach the level of cultural phenomena. <blockquote>Writers like DiAngelo like to...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:47, 29 June 2020

I have always punished myself by reading whichever books are popular, at least the ones that reach the level of cultural phenomena.

Writers like DiAngelo like to make ugly verbs out of ugly nouns and ugly nouns out of ugly verbs (there are countless permutations on centering and privileging alone). In a world where only a few ideas are considered important, redundancy is encouraged, e.g. “To be less white is to break with white silence and white solidarity, to stop privileging the comfort of white people,” or “Ruth Frankenberg, a premier white scholar in the field of whiteness, describes whiteness as multidimensional…”

...

Yet these ideas are taking America by storm. The movement that calls itself “antiracism” – I think it deserves that name a lot less than “pro-lifers” deserve theirs and am amazed journalists parrot it without question – is complete in its pessimism about race relations. It sees the human being as locked into one of three categories: members of oppressed groups, allies, and white oppressors.

- Matt Taibi reviews White Fragility [1]